European Patent Convention · Search and examination procedure
Rule 70a EPC: Response to the extended European search report
Annotated by Mahish Guru, Co-founder and CEO, PatentAssist.ai
Updated
Text of Rule 70a EPC
(3) If the applicant neither complies with nor comments on an invitation in accordance with paragraph 1 or 2, the application shall be deemed to be withdrawn.
In plain English
The European search report comes with a search opinion, together the extended European search report. If the opinion raises objections, Rule 70a obliges you to answer them, either with amendments, with arguments, or both.
The reply is due within the period for requesting examination under Rule 70(1): six months from the date the European Patent Bulletin mentions publication of the search report. If you had already requested examination before receiving the search report, as is usual for Euro-PCT applications with a supplementary search, the EPO sends a Rule 70(2) communication asking whether you want to proceed, and the reply is due within that period instead (Rule 70a(2)).
No reply is needed where the opinion is positive, or where there is no search opinion (Guidelines B-XI, 8). You can still reply voluntarily.
Not everything counts as a reply. A bare request for oral proceedings or a consultation, a simple statement of disagreement, or a request for a decision on the file, without comments on the objections, is not a valid response, and the application is deemed withdrawn.
This is also the first point at which you can amend of your own volition under Rule 137(2), and the examining division takes the reply into account when it writes its first communication. A careful reply here often shortens examination by a whole round.
If the period is missed, the loss of rights can be remedied by further processing: pay the fee within two months of the EPO's communication and file the reply.
Deadlines and fees
| Step | Time limit | Basis |
|---|---|---|
| Reply to the search opinion | 6 months from the mention of publication of the search report | Rules 70(1) and 70a(1) |
| Reply where examination was already requested | The period set in the Rule 70(2) communication | Rule 70a(2) |
| Further processing if missed | 2 months from the loss-of-rights communication; fee €315 | Article 121; Rule 135(1); RFees item 12 |
Common objections
Novelty and inventive step objections in the opinion
Answer each one. Amend the claims with features that have a clear basis, give problem-solution arguments, and indicate the basis of each amendment as Rule 137(4) requires.
Clarity and formal objections
Deal with these at the same time, so that the first examination communication can focus on the remaining substantive issues.
Drafting and prosecution tips
- Use the reply to put your best claim set forward; this is your one free opportunity to amend before examination starts.
- Address every objection, even briefly. A reply that ignores one can still prompt a further communication.
- If PACE or speed matters, a thorough reply here is the best way to reach a Rule 71(3) communication quickly.
Related provisions
- Rule 137 EPC · Amendment of the European patent application
- Rule 71(3) EPC · Examination procedure (intention to grant)
- Rule 112 EPC · Noting of loss of rights
- Rules 161 and 162 EPC · Amendment of the application; claims incurring fees
In the Guidelines for Examination (2026)
PatentAssist guides
EPC excerpts are quoted from the European Patent Convention, 17th edition, as amended and published by the European Patent Office. Practice notes follow the Guidelines for Examination in the EPO (April 2026) and the Boards of Appeal decisions cited. Fees are those in force from 1 April 2026. This is general information, not legal advice: check the official text and confirm deadlines with a European patent attorney.