USPTO guide
Provisional vs nonprovisional patent application
By Dharmik Patel, Co-founder, PatentAssist.ai
Updated
The choice is not either-or. A provisional is a placeholder that holds a date for a year; the nonprovisional is the application that becomes a patent. The real question is whether to file a provisional first or go straight to the nonprovisional. This page compares the two side by side and gives a decision guide. For how to prepare and file a provisional, see our provisional patent application guide; for the full application, see how to file a nonprovisional.
Quick answer
- Provisional: $325 large entity, no claims needed, never examined, expires after 12 months.
- Nonprovisional: $2,000 large entity, needs claims and declarations, examined, can become a patent.
- The link: a nonprovisional filed within 12 months gets the provisional's date for whatever the provisional fully describes (35 U.S.C. 119(e)).
- File a provisional first if you must disclose soon or the invention is still changing. Go straight to the nonprovisional if it is settled and you want a patent sooner.
Side-by-side comparison
Statutes and rules are cited in the cells. Fees are from the USPTO fee schedule effective January 19, 2025, with the small entity nonprovisional figure assuming filing in Patent Center.
| Provisional | Nonprovisional | |
|---|---|---|
| Statute | 35 U.S.C. 111(b) | 35 U.S.C. 111(a) |
| Purpose | Secure a filing date cheaply while you develop, test or fund the invention | Get the application examined and granted |
| Must contain | A description meeting 112(a), drawings where needed, a cover sheet and the fee (37 CFR 1.51(c)) | Specification with claims and abstract, drawings, each inventor's declaration and the fees (1.51(b)) |
| Claims | Optional | At least one, and claims fees over 3 independent or 20 total |
| Examined | Never | Yes |
| Published | Never published; the file becomes open to the public once a published application or patent claims its benefit (37 CFR 1.14) | At 18 months from the earliest benefit date, unless a nonpublication request is filed at filing |
| Lifespan | 12 months, then abandoned with no revival (111(b)(5)) | Pending until it is granted or abandoned |
| Counts toward the 20-year term | No (154(a)(3)) | Yes, the term runs from its filing date |
| Lets you say "patent pending" | Yes | Yes |
| Basis for foreign priority within 12 months | Yes | Yes |
| Information disclosure statement | Cannot be filed (1.51(d)) | Expected; the duty of disclosure applies |
| Non-DOCX surcharge | Does not apply | $430 large if the text is not DOCX (1.16(u)) |
| Available for designs | No (35 U.S.C. 172) | Yes |
| USPTO fees (large / small / micro) | $325 / $130 / $65 | $2,000 / $730 / $400 before excess claims |
What the provisional date is actually worth
The provisional's date only helps claims it supports. Under 35 U.S.C. 119(e)(1), the nonprovisional gets the earlier date "as to such invention" as was disclosed in the provisional in the manner section 112(a) requires. A claim whose limitations are not described and enabled in the provisional is dated from the nonprovisional (MPEP 211.05). Nobody checks this when you file. It comes up years later, when an examiner or a defendant finds art published between the two dates.
So a provisional is only as good as its description. A full draft with drawings, alternatives and at least a set of claims gives a date you can rely on. A slide deck gives a date for very little. The provisional guide covers what to put in it.
Cost of each route
USPTO fees for the two routes, before excess claims and size fees. The provisional route costs one extra provisional fee; the nonprovisional fees are the same either way.
| Nonprovisional only | Provisional, then nonprovisional | |
|---|---|---|
| Large entity | $2,000 | $2,325 ($325 + $2,000) |
| Small entity | $730 | $860 ($130 + $730) |
| Micro entity | $400 | $465 ($65 + $400) |
The official fees are rarely what decides it. A well-drafted provisional costs nearly as much professional time as a nonprovisional specification, and the claims, which a provisional may omit, take the most skill. The provisional's real price advantage is deferral: you pay for the full application a year later, when you know more about the invention and the market. Detailed fee tables are in USPTO patent fees.
Effect on timing, publication and term
Three clocks behave differently depending on which you file first. Publication runs 18 months from the earliest date claimed, which includes the provisional (35 U.S.C. 122(b)(1)). The 20-year term runs from the nonprovisional and ignores the provisional (154(a)(3)). Examination starts only when the nonprovisional is filed.
Worked example: invention ready on February 2, 2026
- Nonprovisional only. Filed February 2, 2026. Effective date February 2, 2026; published around August 2027; queued for examination from February 2026; base expiry February 2, 2046.
- Provisional first. Provisional February 2, 2026, nonprovisional Tuesday, February 2, 2027. Effective date February 2, 2026 for supported claims; still published around August 2027; queued for examination only from February 2027; base expiry February 2, 2047.
Same priority date and publication date. The provisional route trades a year of examination delay for a year of extra term at the far end, plus a year to improve the application and decide whether it is worth filing at all.
Decision guide: which to file
| Your situation | Usually file | Why |
|---|---|---|
| You will show, sell, publish or pitch the invention within weeks, and the full application is not ready | Provisional now | A date before the disclosure protects novelty abroad and stops races at home. Write it as completely as time allows. |
| The design is still changing and you expect to add embodiments or test data over the year | Provisional, possibly several | One nonprovisional can claim several provisionals, each giving its date to what it supports. |
| You need a fundraising or licensing story but cash is tight | Provisional | $130 for a small entity buys 12 months of "patent pending" and time to decide. |
| The invention is finished and you could write claims today | Nonprovisional directly | A provisional adds a filing and a fee but no protection, and delays examination by up to a year. |
| You want a granted patent as soon as possible, for enforcement or investors | Nonprovisional directly, perhaps with Track One | Examination only starts on the nonprovisional. |
| You are protecting the look of a product | Design application | Provisionals cannot support designs. |
| Only a one-page summary or slide deck is available | Write more first, or file and then file again | A thin provisional gives a date only to what it fully describes. File a fuller one as soon as you can. |
If you plan to file abroad, either filing starts the 12-month Paris Convention priority year. Many countries, including the EPO's member states, give no general grace period for your own disclosures, so file before you disclose, whichever route you take. See European patent applications for the EPO side.
Moving from provisional to nonprovisional
- Deadline: 12 months from the provisional, moved to the next business day if it falls on a weekend or federal holiday (35 U.S.C. 21(b)). Missed it unintentionally? File within 2 more months with a petition under 37 CFR 1.78(b) and a $2,260 fee ($904 small, $452 micro).
- File a new application, do not convert: 37 CFR 1.53(c)(3) lets you convert the provisional itself, but the term is then measured from the provisional's date and you lose up to a year. The rule itself recommends claiming the benefit in a new nonprovisional instead.
- Claim it properly: name the provisional by number in the ADS, within the later of 4 months from the nonprovisional's filing and 16 months from the provisional (1.78(a)(3)-(4)), and make sure at least one inventor is common to both.
- Combine provisionals: one nonprovisional can claim several provisionals filed within the previous 12 months, as long as it is filed within 12 months of the earliest one you want to rely on.
- Add what is new: improvements made since the provisional belong in the nonprovisional. They take the nonprovisional's date, so check that nothing published in between discloses them.
- Then keep options open: once the nonprovisional is pending, later claims can come in a continuation application, which keeps the same dates.
Draft once, file either way
PatentAssist.ai drafts a complete specification with claims and drawings in USPTO format from an invention disclosure. File it as a strong provisional now, then build the nonprovisional from the same draft within the year, or file it as the nonprovisional directly. A registered practitioner should review either filing.
More USPTO guides
- How to file a provisional patent application (US)
What a US provisional must contain, the USPTO fees, the 12-month deadline under 35 U.S.C. 119(e), and when to skip it.
- USPTO patent fees (2026)
Every USPTO patent fee for large, small and micro entities, from filing to maintenance, with a fee calculator.
- Patent drawing requirements: USPTO, EPO and India
37 CFR 1.84, the EPO rules that replaced Rule 46 EPC, and Indian rule 15, compared side by side.
- How to write patent claims: USPTO, EPO and India
Claim structure and worked examples, then the claim rules and fees at the USPTO, the EPO and the Indian Patent Office, side by side.
- How to respond to a USPTO office action
Reply deadlines and extension fees, 101, 102, 103 and 112 rejections, interviews, and options after a final rejection.
- Types of patent searches, and which one you need
Patentability, freedom-to-operate, invalidity and landscape searches compared by purpose, timing, scope and deliverable.
- Patentability search: how to check novelty before you file
What counts as prior art under 35 U.S.C. 102 and Art. 54 EPC, the grace period gap, search steps and how to read results.
- Freedom-to-operate search in the US and Europe
In-force claims only, legal status checks at the USPTO, EPO and UPC, FTO opinions after Halo, and design-arounds.
- Invalidity search: prior art to challenge a patent
IPR, PGR, EPO opposition and UPC revocation deadlines, prior art dates, standards documents and claim charts.
- Patent landscape analysis, step by step
Building a CPC and keyword dataset, cleaning families and names, the metrics that matter and the 18-month publication lag.
- How to use USPTO Patent Public Search
Basic and Advanced Search, the three databases, field codes, ADJ, NEAR, WITH and SAME, truncation and a worked search.
- Google Patents search guide
Search operators and fields, Boolean and proximity syntax, non-patent literature, and where Google Patents falls short of the official databases.
- The Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC), explained
How CPC symbols are built, CPC against IPC, the Y section, how to find the right class and how to search it in each database.
- Patent search Boolean operators and search strings
Boolean, proximity and truncation syntax compared across Patent Public Search, Espacenet, Google Patents and The Lens, with semantic search for contrast.
- How to respond to a 35 U.S.C. 101 rejection
The Alice/Mayo steps in MPEP 2106, Ex parte Desjardins and the 2024-2026 USPTO guidance, Berkheimer evidence and Rule 132 eligibility declarations.
- How to respond to a 35 U.S.C. 102 rejection
Anticipation under MPEP 2131, AIA 102(a)(1) and (a)(2), the 102(b) exceptions, inherency and Rule 130 declarations.
- How to respond to a 35 U.S.C. 103 rejection
Graham and the KSR rationales in MPEP 2143, teaching away, motivation to combine, secondary considerations with nexus, and Rule 132 evidence.
- How to respond to a 35 U.S.C. 112 rejection
Written description and enablement after Amgen, 112(b) indefiniteness, 112(f) means-plus-function after Williamson, and 112(d) dependent claims.
- The PCT application: timeline, fees and national phase
The international phase month by month, receiving Office and ISA fees in CHF, USD and EUR, national phase deadlines by office, and a deadline calculator.
- Entering the US national stage under 35 U.S.C. 371
The 30-month deadline and revival, the 371 requirements, national stage fees by entity size, and 371 versus a bypass continuation.
- The US foreign filing license (35 U.S.C. 184)
When a US-made invention needs a license to be filed abroad, the six-month rule, expedited and retroactive licenses, and the Indian and European equivalents.
- Filing a US patent from Europe or India
The 2026 US practitioner rule for foreign applicants, Paris priority and certified copies, small entity status, PCT or direct, fees and translations.
- What is a utility patent?
What a US utility patent covers under 35 U.S.C. 101, the parts of the application in 37 CFR 1.77 order, the 20-year term and USPTO costs.
- Design patents in the United States
What a design patent protects, drawings and the single claim, the 15-year term, Hague filings, LKQ v. GM, and design vs utility patents.
- How to file a nonprovisional patent application
Required parts and fees, claiming a provisional within 12 months, DOCX filing in Patent Center, and what happens after you file.
- Continuation, CIP and divisional applications
Copendency, patent term, double patenting and terminal disclaimers, the 2025 continuing application fee, and continuation strategy.
- How much does a patent cost?
USPTO fees by entity size from filing to the last maintenance fee, what drives professional fees, EPO fees, and an estimator.
- How to patent an idea in the US
Nine steps from patentability and search to provisional filing, Patent Center, examination and maintenance, with the USPTO's free help programs.
- Small entity vs micro entity status
Who qualifies under 37 CFR 1.27 and 1.29, the 2026 income limit, SB/15A and SB/15B, license traps, fixing errors, and an eligibility checker.
- How long does a patent last?
US utility and design terms, patent term adjustment and extension, terminal disclaimers, maintenance fee deadlines, Europe and India, with an expiry estimator.
- Can AI write a patent application?
What AI drafting does well and badly, the USPTO and EPO positions on AI tools, AI inventorship after 2025, and confidentiality.
- Restriction requirements and election of species
How to answer a USPTO restriction or election of species requirement, from traverse and rejoinder to divisionals and unity in 371 cases.
- Options after a final rejection
Amendment after final, advisory actions, the end of AFCP 2.0, RCE, pre-appeal and appeal, with fees, timing and USPTO outcome data.
- Request for continued examination (RCE)
What 37 CFR 1.114 requires, first and later RCE fees, patent term effects, and when an RCE beats an appeal.
- Information disclosure statements (IDS)
The duty of disclosure, IDS timing windows and fees, the 2025 size fee, EPO search reports, Therasense and QPIDS.
- PTAB ex parte appeals
Notice of appeal to decision step by step, with fees, deadlines and the PTAB's FY 2026 pendency and outcome statistics.
- Track One prioritized examination
Track One requirements, fees by entity size, the 20,000 annual cap and USPTO timing data, plus PPH and age or health petitions.
- 35 U.S.C., annotated: US patent law section by section
The current text of 34 key sections of Title 35 with plain-English summaries, key cases, 37 CFR rules and MPEP references.
Provisional vs nonprovisional: frequently asked questions
What is the difference between a provisional and a nonprovisional patent application?
A provisional (35 U.S.C. 111(b)) holds a filing date for 12 months. It needs no claims or declaration, is never examined or published, and cannot become a patent by itself. A nonprovisional (111(a)) is the full application with claims that the USPTO examines and can grant. A nonprovisional filed within 12 months can claim the provisional's date for what the provisional describes.
Is a provisional patent worth it?
It is worth it when you need a date before you are ready to file the full application: before a launch, a paper, a pitch or a trade show, or while the invention is still changing. It is not worth it when the invention is settled, because it delays examination and adds a fee without adding protection.
Does a provisional patent application extend the life of a patent?
In effect, yes. The 20-year term runs from the nonprovisional's filing date, not the provisional's (35 U.S.C. 154(a)(3)), so filing a provisional first can push expiry up to a year later. You get that only by filing a new nonprovisional that claims the provisional; converting the provisional itself measures the term from the provisional date.
Can I skip the provisional and file a nonprovisional directly?
Yes. A provisional is optional. Many applicants file a nonprovisional directly when the invention is ready, which also starts examination a year earlier.
What happens if I do not file a nonprovisional within 12 months?
The provisional expires and its date is lost. You have 2 more months to restore the benefit by petition under 37 CFR 1.78(b), if the delay was unintentional, with a fee of $2,260 ($904 small, $452 micro). After that, any nonprovisional gets only its own filing date, and anything you disclosed in the meantime may be prior art against it outside the US grace period.
How much more does a nonprovisional cost than a provisional?
USPTO fees are $325 for a provisional and $2,000 for a nonprovisional at the large entity rate ($130 and $730 small; $65 and $400 micro), before excess claims fees. The bigger difference is drafting: a nonprovisional needs claims and a polished specification.
Sources: 35 U.S.C. 111, 119, 122, 154 and 172; 37 CFR 1.16, 1.17(m), 1.51, 1.53 and 1.78 (eCFR, current as of October 22, 2026); MPEP 211.05; USPTO fee schedule (effective January 19, 2025, last revised August 14, 2026). Checked October 26, 2026. This guide is general information, not legal advice. Have a registered patent attorney or agent review your filing strategy.